[Most Recent Entries]
Thursday, July 30th, 2009
|Stuff I didn't know about ...
This is another dollar store acquisition … which gives me an opening to, perhaps, be a bit more negative about it than it deserves. The subject matter of Ann Finkbeiner's The Jasons: The Secret History of Science's Postwar Elite
is certainly interesting
, and is, somehow, something that I hadn't encountered (or at least it hadn't “registered”) in my extensive Physics and Military History reading. The book, however, is pretty dry
, and while it never really drags
it also lacks some of the engagement that the topic could well have in other hands.
“The Jasons” were a loose grouping of top-notch scientists (initially primarily Physicists), which were assembled to help the Government with various projects, working on particular problems over a several-week session in the summer each year, starting in the thick of the Cold War. Initially named Project 137 (an in-joke for the denominator of the fine structure constant), the group first met in 1958, scant months after the Soviet launch of Sputnik. This was largely the “next generation” down from the Manhattan Project crowd, young, brilliant, and eager to tackle serious science problems. At first they were simply being briefed by the military regarding general challenges that were proving difficult to solve, from communicating with submarines, to improving the still-nascent US satellite program. The name “Jason” seems to have come from the wife of one of the initial group, although the specifics are blurred with time (the suggestion is that they were like Jason seeking the Golden Fleece).
I don't know where the fault lies in this book, the “science stories” involved could have had the vibrancy of a “procedural” thriller, but more focus seems to have gone to the moral status of the various teams over time. The author does not appear to be inclined to “flesh out” scenarios that she does not have primary or secondary source material for, so there is less narrative than one might prefer in this sort of a history, she is very much limited by what the various participants (and their associates) are willing (or, for security reasons, able) to discuss with her. And it appears that, to a certain extent, many of the older members (this book came out in 2006, nearly 50 years after the first group of “Jasons” met) were more willing to reflect on their feeling
about their work with Jason rather than “juicy details” of the work itself.
It is also possible that Finkbeiner had “an axe to grind” here, as the subject of campus resistance to the U.S. Military in the 60's and 70's, keeps getting interjected, and one suspects that she might have a bit more than passing sympathy for the anti-war cause. She makes an effort in the early chapters (echoed on the dust jacket) to create a “philosophical” basis for the book:
The idea that curiosity leads to disaster has an ancient pedigree. Pandora opened the gods' box and let loose all the evils of the world; the descendants of Noah built the Tower of Babel to reach heaven, but God scattered them and confounded their language; Icarus flew so close to the sun that his homemade wings melted, and he fell into the sea and drowned; Eve at the apple of knowledge and was exiled from the Garden of Eden; Faust traded his soul for sorcery and spent eternity in Hell. Saint Augustine , along with most medieval Christian theologians, considered curiositas a vice. The idea survived into the twentieth century about halfway intact. We believe that curiosity is the beginning of knowledge and especially of science, but we know that the application of science has led to disaster.
This sets the book up to be a morality tale, but (aside from the reports of various interactions of the participating scientists) there's not enough “there” there to make that work either.
So, while this is an interesting reporting of a fascinating project, it neither “delivers the goods” as a science history, nor as a grand moral struggle. Throw in the heavy sprinkling of passing references to the politics and politicians inter-relating with the Jasons, and the whole becomes weaker than the details involved.
As I so often end up saying, the above doesn't mean that The Jasons
is a bad
book, only that it could have been so much more
, whether as a scientific saga, a baby-boom bile fest, or even as a political tale. As it is, it's a bit of each, and is lessened in its lack of focus. Needless to say, I would have preferred
a book that went more into the research and scientific discovery, but (as noted above) some of this stuff is still classified
, so would have posed serious challenges to flesh this out as much as I would have liked in that direction!
Again, this book is only 3 years old and is already out of print, so I guess there weren't many who found this to their liking. As mentioned, I found it at the dollar store, so you might be able to find a copy similarly discounted, and the Amazon new/used guys have "good" copies for as low as a penny (plus S&H, natch), and "like new" for a couple of bucks. Once more, this is a flawed
book (it had all the signs of an interesting project that only became untenable far too down the line to scrap it altogether), but not a bad
book, and it's written well enough
that it doesn't get noticeably bogged down at any point. If you're interested in physics, politics, and military history (all at once) this is likely a good book for you, with lessening degrees of likelihood depending on the mix of those interests.
|Very odd ...
Yes, I know that I frequently
describe assorted books here as "odd", but this one is quite
odd in that, while it does appear
to have an ISBN and a publisher, there is no trace of this on the Internet ... not at Amazon, not at B&N, not on LibraryThing.com, not in the various corners poked into by Google. And, this isn't some obscure chapbook from the 1960's ... it was published just four years ago, not in some unpronounceable place in south or central Asia, but right here in the U.S. of A., so there is no good reason that this should be so invisible
! How did I get it? The author (and his associates from http://iamprakash.com
) had a table at a recent "sidewalk sale" up in Lincoln Square, and they gave
me a couple of books, this being one of them. Very odd, indeed.
This slim volume, Almost Home: A Correspondence with a Spiritual Teacher
, is fairly odd in and of itself. It is not directly attributed to a particular author (although "Prakash" is on the spine), and appears to be an actual set of e-mail exchanges between "Angie" and "Prakash" (aka Kevin Edwards). Now, Prakash, as one might guess from the name, is a bit of a New Age teacher. Frankly, what I've read of his writing so far has impressed me with its focus, directness, and ecumenical sourcing. So, I was somewhat surprised to find that the main credential that he trots out is "a Masters Degree in Sacred Theology from the Angelicum
in Rome", which, upon a bit more digging, is not
some new age workshop space in the back of a coffeehouse, but The Pontifical University of Saint Thomas Aquinas, brought to you by the same lovely Dominican order that was so zealous with their management of the Inquisition!
In this book, "Angie" (who appears to be a real person, but her web site is locked down, and there's not much else about her) is going for a mid-life Confirmation in the Catholic Church (a conversion, I take it), and she is having all sorts of cognitive dissonance (OK, she doesn't see it that way, just "weakness") with all the B.S. that's involved with trying to swallow The Big Lie lock, stock, and barrel. I guess Prakash (based on his Dominican training?) was recommended to her and they have this back-and-forth exchange.
As noted above, there is nothing
that I could find any fault with (well, the Biblical references, but that's just me
) in anything that Prakash tells her ... but it's almost comical to watch "Angie" fall all over herself trying to out-Catholic the Pope, interspersed with "oh, now I'm enlightened
!" non-sequiturs of the newage variety. Prakash is obviously very well versed in Buddhism, Vedanta, Sufism, etc. and brings this awareness to bear on the floundering "Angie". The book takes her through almost a "deprogramming" and then into a "Catholic relapse". I suspect that the reason this book is "invisible" is that "Angie" (who does have a full name listed) decided that full-bore Papism was what she needed rather than enlightenment, and pulled out of the project (speaking of "projects", the apparent publisher of this is a group called "Awakened Heart Project" which is the name of a newagey Jewish
site, but with no mention of this book). This could explain the sort of "shadow existence" the book seems to be in at this point!
Anyway, I am fascinated by this Prakash fellow ... I'm presently reading the other book I got from them, and am quite taken by his substance and style (as opposed to the videos on his site, which, frankly, creep me out a bit) ... I will be interested in figuring out what he's about and where he's coming from. Again, his side
of these exchanges are quite inspiring, and well worth the read.
Since there is no "trace" of Almost Home
out in the real world, it appears that ordering it direct is one's only option ... it is available there, as is a .pdf download of about 1/4th of the book (interesting, with the ISBN stripped out). This is an odd one, but the "teaching" in it seems to be quality, so you might want to check it out (I think I will have something more substantial to say about the next one!).